Visual Tools
Calculators
Tables
Mathematical Keyboard
Converters
Other Tools


Chebyshev Inequality Visualization



Chebyshev Inequality Visualizer

P(|X - μ| ≥ a) ≤ σ² / a²
P(|X - 10| ≥ 3) ≤ 4 / 9.0 = 0.444 = 44.4%
Actual: 13.4%
xPDFμ=10μ-aμ+a24681012141618

Chebyshev Inequality: For any distribution with mean μ and variance σ²: P(|X - μ| ≥ a) ≤ σ² / a²

Red areas show P(X < μ-a) + P(X > μ+a). Bound: 44.4%, Actual: 13.4%







Visualizing Chebyshev's Inequality

Chebyshev's inequality bounds the probability of deviating from the mean: P(|X - μ| ≥ a) ≤ σ² / a². This tool visualizes the two-tailed bound across nine distributions, showing both the Chebyshev bound and actual probability. Adjust mean, variance, and deviation threshold to explore how bounds behave.



Getting Started with the Chebyshev Visualizer

This tool demonstrates Chebyshev's inequality, which bounds the probability of deviating from the mean using variance. The visualization shows a probability distribution with both tails highlighted in red.

The left panel displays the PDF (for continuous) or PMF (for discrete distributions). A green dashed line marks the mean μ, and red dashed lines mark μ-a and μ+a. The red shaded regions represent the actual probability of being more than a away from the mean.

The top panel shows the Chebyshev bound formula and compares it to the actual two-tailed probability. Adjust mean, variance, and deviation threshold to explore when the bound is tight versus loose.

Understanding the Chebyshev Bound

Chebyshev's inequality states:

P(Xμa)σ2a2P(|X - \mu| \geq a) \leq \frac{\sigma^2}{a^2}


This bounds the probability of being at least a units away from the mean μ, in either direction. The bound uses two parameters:

• μ = EX], the [expected value
• σ² = Var(X), the variance

The bound decreases quadratically as a increases. Doubling the threshold reduces the bound by a factor of 4. This quadratic relationship makes Chebyshev tighter than Markov for large deviations.

The visualization shows both tails simultaneously, representing P(X < μ-a) + P(X > μ+a).

The k Standard Deviations Form

Chebyshev is often expressed in terms of standard deviations. Setting a = kσ gives:

P(Xμkσ)1k2P(|X - \mu| \geq k\sigma) \leq \frac{1}{k^2}


This yields memorable bounds:

• k = 2: At least 75% of values within 2σ of mean (bound = 1/4 = 25% outside)
• k = 3: At least 89% within 3σ (bound = 1/9 ≈ 11% outside)
• k = 4: At least 94% within 4σ (bound = 1/16 ≈ 6% outside)
• k = 5: At least 96% within 5σ (bound = 1/25 = 4% outside)

These percentages are worst-case guarantees. Actual distributions like Normal concentrate much more tightly—99.7% of Normal values fall within 3σ, far better than Chebyshev's 89% guarantee.

Using the Control Sliders

Three sliders control the distribution and bound:

Mean (μ) Slider (green): Sets the expected value from 5 to 20. The distribution centers on this value, and the green dashed line moves accordingly.

Variance (σ²) Slider (purple): Sets the variance from 1 to 16. Higher variance spreads the distribution wider, affecting both the shape and the Chebyshev bound.

Deviation Threshold (a) Slider (red): Sets the distance from mean from 0.5 to 10. The red dashed lines at μ-a and μ+a move, changing the shaded tail regions.

Key experiments:

• Fix μ and a, then increase σ²: The bound increases (loosens)
• Fix μ and σ², then increase a: The bound decreases quadratically
• Compare Normal vs Exponential at identical settings

Two-Tailed vs One-Tailed Bounds

Chebyshev bounds two-tailed probability: deviations in BOTH directions from the mean. The visualization shows this with red shading on both the left tail (X < μ-a) and right tail (X > μ+a).

For symmetric distributions like Normal, these tails are equal. For asymmetric distributions like Exponential, one tail dominates.

If you need a one-tailed bound, Chebyshev gives:

P(Xμ+a)σ2a2P(X \geq \mu + a) \leq \frac{\sigma^2}{a^2}


But this is looser than necessary because the two-tailed bound includes both sides. For strictly one-tailed bounds, Markov's inequality applied to appropriate transformations may be tighter.

Comparing Bound to Actual Probability

The information panel displays:

Bound: Chebyshev's upper bound σ²/a²
Actual: True probability P(|X - μ| ≥ a)

Typical observations across distributions:

Normal distribution: Chebyshev is very conservative. At 2σ, bound is 25% but actual is about 4.5%. At 3σ, bound is 11% but actual is about 0.3%.

Uniform distribution: Chebyshev can be exact at the distribution boundaries. The uniform distribution is one of the "worst cases" for Chebyshev.

Exponential distribution: Asymmetric, so left tail contributes differently than right tail. Bound is moderately loose.

The gap demonstrates that Chebyshev guarantees apply to all distributions, including pathological ones that concentrate probability at exactly ±a from the mean.

Why Chebyshev's Inequality Matters

Chebyshev's inequality is fundamental because:

Distribution-free: Works for ANY distribution with finite mean and variance. No shape assumptions required.

Tighter than Markov: Uses variance information for quadratic improvement. The 1/k² decay is much faster than Markov's 1/k.

Theoretical cornerstone: Used to prove the weak law of large numbers, convergence of sample means, and consistency of estimators.

Practical applications:
• Quality control: Setting tolerance limits based on process variance
• Finance: Bounding portfolio deviations from expected return
• Statistics: Constructing distribution-free confidence intervals

The tradeoff is conservatism. When you know more about your distribution (e.g., it's Normal), distribution-specific bounds are much tighter.

Related Tools and Concepts

Chebyshev's inequality connects to other probability concepts and tools:

Theory Pages:

Chebyshev Inequality covers complete theory and proofs

Markov Inequality is the weaker precursor

Variance is a key input for Chebyshev

Expected Value provides the center point

Other Visualizations:

Markov Visualizer shows one-tailed bounds

Variance Visualizer demonstrates spread concepts

Distribution Visualizers display full PDFs and CDFs

Related Topics:

Probability Distributions covers the distributions used here

Central Limit Theorem relies on concentration arguments