Four govern addition, four govern scalar multiplication. Together with closure they are exactly the vector space axioms — which is why anything proved from them holds for polynomials and matrices too, not just arrows.
Order of addition does not matter. Geometrically, the parallelogram is the same figure traversed two ways — tip-to-tail in either order lands on the same diagonal.
Grouping does not matter, so a chain of additions needs no parentheses. This is what lets linear combinations be written as a single sum.
The zero vector leaves everything unchanged. It is the origin — the one point every subspace must contain, since without it there is no identity to add.
Every vector can be undone by the arrow pointing the opposite way. This is what makes subtraction definable at all — is shorthand for , not a separate operation.
Scaling twice equals scaling once by the product. Note the two multiplications are different operations — happens between numbers, between a number and a vector — and the law is the claim that they agree.
Scaling spreads over a sum of vectors. Together with the next law this is precisely what linearity demands of a transformation — the definition is these two conditions and nothing more.
The mirror of the law above — spreading over a sum of scalars rather than of vectors. Both are needed, and neither follows from the other.
The one that looks like it need not be stated. It is what ties the scalars to the vectors: drop it and scaling could collapse everything to while every other law still held.