Solving logarithmic inequalities follows similar algebraic steps as equations, with one critical addition: the base determines whether inequality direction is preserved or reversed. This behavior stems from the monotonicity property — logarithms with base greater than one are increasing functions, while those with base between zero and one are decreasing.
Key Terms
Inequality Concepts
Logarithmic Inequality— inequality direction depends on whether the base is greater than or less than 1
Monotonicity— the property that controls whether direction is preserved or reversed
When a>1, the function f(x)=loga(x) is strictly increasing. Larger inputs produce larger outputs, so inequality direction is preserved when converting between logarithmic and exponential forms.
For loga(x)>k with a>1:
loga(x)>k⟹x>ak
For loga(x)<k with a>1:
loga(x)<k⟹x<ak
Example: Solve log2(x)>3.
x>23
x>8
Combined with the domain requirement x>0, the solution is x>8.
Example: Solve log5(x)≤2.
x≤52
x≤25
With domain: 0<x≤25.
Base Between Zero and One: Direction Reversed
When 0<a<1, the function f(x)=loga(x) is strictly decreasing. Larger inputs produce smaller outputs, so inequality direction reverses.
For loga(x)>k with 0<a<1:
loga(x)>k⟹x<ak
For loga(x)<k with 0<a<1:
loga(x)<k⟹x>ak
Example: Solve log1/2(x)>3.
Since the base 1/2<1, reverse the inequality:
x<(21)3=81
With domain: 0<x<81.
Example: Solve log0.1(x)≤−2.
Reverse direction:
x≥(0.1)−2=100
Solution: x≥100.
Logarithms on Both Sides
When the same base appears on both sides, use monotonicity to compare arguments directly.
For a>1:
loga(M)>loga(N)⟹M>N
For 0<a<1:
loga(M)>loga(N)⟹M<N
Example: Solve log3(2x+1)>log3(x+4) where base 3>1.
2x+1>x+4
x>3
Check domain: 2x+1>0 requires x>−1/2; x+4>0 requires x>−4. The intersection with x>3 is simply x>3.
Example: Solve log1/3(x−1)<log1/3(5) where base 1/3<1.
Reverse when comparing arguments:
x−1>5
x>6
Domain requires x−1>0, so x>1. Final solution: x>6.
Domain Considerations
Every logarithmic argument must be positive. This constraint intersects with the algebraic solution, often restricting the answer.
Example: Solve log2(x−3)>1.
Algebraically:
x−3>21=2
x>5
Domain: x−3>0⟹x>3.
Intersection: x>5 satisfies x>3, so the solution is x>5.
Example: Solve log4(x+2)<0.
Algebraically:
x+2<40=1
x<−1
Domain: x+2>0⟹x>−2.
Intersection: −2<x<−1.
Failing to intersect with domain constraints is a common error. Always state domain restrictions at the start and combine them with the algebraic result.
Compound Inequalities
Compound inequalities bound the logarithm between two values.
Example: Solve 1<log2(x)<4.
Split into two inequalities with base 2>1:
log2(x)>1⟹x>2
log2(x)<4⟹x<16
Combined: 2<x<16.
Example: Solve −1≤log3(x+1)≤2.
log3(x+1)≥−1⟹x+1≥3−1=31⟹x≥−32
log3(x+1)≤2⟹x+1≤9⟹x≤8
Domain: x+1>0⟹x>−1.
Intersection: −32≤x≤8 already satisfies x>−1.
Solution: −32≤x≤8.
Inequalities with Combined Logarithms
When logarithm rules are needed, condense first, then solve.
Example: Solve log2(x)+log2(x−2)>3.
Condense:
log2(x(x−2))>3
log2(x2−2x)>3
Since base 2>1:
x2−2x>8
x2−2x−8>0
(x−4)(x+2)>0
This holds when x<−2 or x>4.
Domain: x>0 and x−2>0 gives x>2.
Intersection with x>4 or x<−2: only x>4 survives.
Solution: x>4.
Graphical Interpretation
The graph of y=loga(x) provides visual understanding of why direction depends on base.
For a>1, the curve rises from left to right. The inequality loga(x)>k asks: where is the curve above the horizontal line y=k? Since the curve is increasing, this occurs to the right of the intersection point — for x>ak.
For 0<a<1, the curve falls from left to right. The inequality loga(x)>k asks the same question, but now the curve is above the line to the left of the intersection — for x<ak.
The vertical asymptote at x=0 visually enforces the domain restriction. No portion of the graph exists for x≤0, so no solutions can come from that region.