Solving logarithmic inequalities follows similar algebraic steps as equations, with one critical addition: the base determines whether inequality direction is preserved or reversed. This behavior stems from the monotonicity property — logarithms with base greater than one are increasing functions, while those with base between zero and one are decreasing.
Base Greater Than One: Direction Preserved
When a>1, the function f(x)=loga(x) is strictly increasing. Larger inputs produce larger outputs, so inequality direction is preserved when converting between logarithmic and exponential forms.
For loga(x)>k with a>1:
loga(x)>k⟹x>ak
For loga(x)<k with a>1:
loga(x)<k⟹x<ak
Example: Solve log2(x)>3.
x>23
x>8
Combined with the domain requirement x>0, the solution is x>8.
Example: Solve log5(x)≤2.
x≤52
x≤25
With domain: 0<x≤25.
Base Between Zero and One: Direction Reversed
When 0<a<1, the function f(x)=loga(x) is strictly decreasing. Larger inputs produce smaller outputs, so inequality direction reverses.
For loga(x)>k with 0<a<1:
loga(x)>k⟹x<ak
For loga(x)<k with 0<a<1:
loga(x)<k⟹x>ak
Example: Solve log1/2(x)>3.
Since the base 1/2<1, reverse the inequality:
x<(21)3=81
With domain: 0<x<81.
Example: Solve log0.1(x)≤−2.
Reverse direction:
x≥(0.1)−2=100
Solution: x≥100.
Logarithms on Both Sides
When the same base appears on both sides, use monotonicity to compare arguments directly.
For a>1:
loga(M)>loga(N)⟹M>N
For 0<a<1:
loga(M)>loga(N)⟹M<N
Example: Solve log3(2x+1)>log3(x+4) where base 3>1.
2x+1>x+4
x>3
Check domain: 2x+1>0 requires x>−1/2; x+4>0 requires x>−4. The intersection with x>3 is simply x>3.
Example: Solve log1/3(x−1)<log1/3(5) where base 1/3<1.
Reverse when comparing arguments:
x−1>5
x>6
Domain requires x−1>0, so x>1. Final solution: x>6.
Domain Considerations
Every logarithmic argument must be positive. This constraint intersects with the algebraic solution, often restricting the answer.
Example: Solve log2(x−3)>1.
Algebraically:
x−3>21=2
x>5
Domain: x−3>0⟹x>3.
Intersection: x>5 satisfies x>3, so the solution is x>5.
Example: Solve log4(x+2)<0.
Algebraically:
x+2<40=1
x<−1
Domain: x+2>0⟹x>−2.
Intersection: −2<x<−1.
Failing to intersect with domain constraints is a common error. Always state domain restrictions at the start and combine them with the algebraic result.
Compound Inequalities
Compound inequalities bound the logarithm between two values.
Example: Solve 1<log2(x)<4.
Split into two inequalities with base 2>1:
log2(x)>1⟹x>2
log2(x)<4⟹x<16
Combined: 2<x<16.
Example: Solve −1≤log3(x+1)≤2.
log3(x+1)≥−1⟹x+1≥3−1=31⟹x≥−32
log3(x+1)≤2⟹x+1≤9⟹x≤8
Domain: x+1>0⟹x>−1.
Intersection: −32≤x≤8 already satisfies x>−1.
Solution: −32≤x≤8.
Inequalities with Combined Logarithms
When logarithm rules are needed, condense first, then solve.
Example: Solve log2(x)+log2(x−2)>3.
Condense:
log2(x(x−2))>3
log2(x2−2x)>3
Since base 2>1:
x2−2x>8
x2−2x−8>0
(x−4)(x+2)>0
This holds when x<−2 or x>4.
Domain: x>0 and x−2>0 gives x>2.
Intersection with x>4 or x<−2: only x>4 survives.
Solution: x>4.
Graphical Interpretation
The graph of y=loga(x) provides visual understanding of why direction depends on base.
For a>1, the curve rises from left to right. The inequality loga(x)>k asks: where is the curve above the horizontal line y=k? Since the curve is increasing, this occurs to the right of the intersection point — for x>ak.
For 0<a<1, the curve falls from left to right. The inequality loga(x)>k asks the same question, but now the curve is above the line to the left of the intersection — for x<ak.
The vertical asymptote at x=0 visually enforces the domain restriction. No portion of the graph exists for x≤0, so no solutions can come from that region.