This reasoning applies whenever a system can be in different states, and each state affects the outcome differently.
When the outcome depends on which case you're in:
A diagnostic test's accuracy differs for people who actually have the disease versus those who don't. The overall rate of positive tests depends on both groups.
When data comes from mixed sources:
Survey results combine responses from different age groups, regions, or demographics. The overall pattern reflects contributions from each subgroup.
When you don't know the underlying condition:
A machine might be operating in good condition or degraded condition. Failure rates differ in each state, but if you don't know which state it's in, you need to consider both possibilities.
When processes have multiple pathways:
A delivery can be delayed by weather, traffic, or mechanical failure. Each pathway has its own probability, and the total delay probability accounts for all routes.
The intuition is always the same: the final probability is a weighted blend of case-specific probabilities. Each scenario contributes its piece, weighted by how likely that scenario is to occur in the first place.